Discharge, terminating professional contacts
how professional and or informal follow up is properly communicated, available and well prepared
Keywords: Case management, access, integration, needs, inappropriate hospital admissions
Case management for patients of lower socio-economic status experiencing complex somatic and psychosocial problems (Kompass)
Summary
Kompass is one of seven projects developed within the framework of the "Health Network 2025", (Gesundheitsnetz 2025). Initiated by the Health Department of the City of Zurich. The Health Network aims to facilitate and improve networking among service providers and to promote collaboration between them.
The project addresses the gaps between acute health care and social care, as well as between hospital and home care. It is available to people from lower socio-economic groups recovering from acute medical conditions or suffering from chronic diseases. It was initiated in 2010.
Based on case management, Kompass is led by a interdisciplinary team consisting of 5 people (3.4 FTEs). In the first year of a 3 year pilot, 111 patients were supported. Approximately one third of the patients were 65 years or older. The average length of hospital stays for this patient category has been reduced. However, this trend still has to be confirmed by the external project evaluation, which results are outstanding.
What is the main benefit for people in need of care and/or carers?
The main benefit for people in need of care is to have a single reference person for the whole range of problems and needs they experience.
What is the main message for practice and/or policy in relation to this sub-theme?
It shows that investing in professional care staff to improve coordinated access and monitoring of health and social services can lead to a better quality of life while improving economic efficency through shorter hospital stay.
Why was this example implemented?
Kompass was started with the aim to facilitate access to health and social care services by providing case management for patients who are emotionally fragile, poor, socially isolated and who have complex needs due to acute medical conditions. It addresses the gaps between acute health care and social care, as well as between hospital and home care.
Kompass aims to promote equal access to health care and social services by providing an appropriate service to the most vulnerable population groups. It also has the goal of contributing to the reduction of the average length of stay for this group of patients through better discharge planning, one of the measures intended to prepare acute-care hospitals to “get fit for DRG’s” (Diagnosis Related Groups), that should be introduced in 2012.
Kompass supports health care providers, whether formal or informal, through case management, reducing their workload by handling complex cases professionally.
Approximatively 400,000 people live in the city of Zürich. In 2009, 17,000 people were treated in acute somatic or psychiatric hospitals. An estimated 2% of inpatients, or 340 people annually, fulfill the admission criteria defined by Kompass.
Description
Kompass offers case management for patients with complex somatic and psychological problems.
The main partners of Kompass are the four largest public hospitals in the City of Zurich, the Stadtärztlicher Dienst, the Städtische Gesundheitsdienste and the home care services. The partners referred more than half of the patients managed by the project team. The other partners are the social services of the city of Zürich - churches, psychiatrists, general practitioners and other organisations.
At the end of the first year, the team consisted of 5 people (3.4. FTEs): 2 psychiatric nurses, 1 psychologist, 1 social worker and 1 student social worker on an internship. At the end of the year, the team had 43 open cases.
In the first year, the project team completed 111 follow-ups; approximately 30% of the supported persons were 65 or older. Thirty other cases were not admitted to the programme due to unavailability of staff. The duration of follow-ups ranges from a few days to 10 months.
What are/were the effects?
An intermediate evaluation shows that the arrangement is likely to reach the given goals. Nevertheless, the permanent implementation of the project will depend on the decision of the executive board of the health department, based on the results of the final evaluation conducted by the University of Applied Sciences of Bern.
The evaluation should show whether:
- it is possible to reconcile the social and the economic goals of the project,
- case management is an effective and economically efficient means of achieving these goals.
What are the strengths and limitations?
The big challenge of this project is the wide variety of issues team members have to handle, including medical, psychiatric and social problems as well as domestic violence, abuse, crime, or “Diogenes syndrome”. The case management approach enables efficient management of the high average level of complexity of the cases.
The project constitutes an immediate response to a real demand of the Kompass partner organisations. Yet its permanent commissioning has to be confirmed by the City Government.
The final evaluation will establish whether the case management provided by Kompass can reinforce social equality while being cost effective.
Credits
Author: Pierre GobetReviewer 1: Roelf van der Veen
Reviewer 2: Michel Naiditch
Verified by: Christian Kistler Thoma, Kompass
Links to other INTERLINKS practice examples
- Coordinating Care for Older People (COPA): Team work integrating health and social care professionals in community care
- Integrated home care and discharge practice for home care clients (PALKOmodel)